Archive for the "Marketing" Category

dukky_logo

I spent a few days at the Internet Retailer Conference and Exhibition last week in Boston on behalf of Dukky. Despite the gloomy economy and the shrinking budgets of consumers and marketers alike, enthusiasm about the future of e-commerce buzzed. It seems we’re on the brink of a new frontier – thanks to emerging mobile technologies, wide adoption of social networking sites and a new consumer sentiment that prizes transparency and responsibility.

Here are the five most important e-commerce concepts I either learned (or remembered) while at IRCE:

1) Look at the mobile commerce space as the web of the early 90s: Mobile is changing the world. From the riots in Iran to the coupons in your local grocery store, mobile devices are changing the way we communicate, make purchases, spend our “free time.” Smart phones are 13% of the market now and growing to 38% in 2013. A lot more innovation is to come.

2) Focus on connecting consumers with your brand not your products: Under Armour’s vice president of e-commerce Mark Kuhns said their social media strategy is focused on creating a connection in their customers lives rather than just selling them stuff. It’s working.

3) Email, social & search should be integral in customer acquisition: Customers are spending more and more of  their time online. You need to go out and find them there. You’ll lose them if you don’t.

4) Many companies spoke about getting ready for the recovery instead of wading in the recession: Now is the time to innovate – it’s not the time to hole up and hide. We wrote more about innovation is key to keeping your marketing job earlier this month.

5) Be fiercely competitive and don’t be afraid to take ideas from the bigger players: Amazon is a great example – they started by just selling books and music, now they sell just about everything.
What are your thoughts on e-retail on today’s econcomy?

Taken from my post on Dukky

Todd Skidmore pulled out the win with his design.  Heather and I, independent of each other, chose his design as the best.  The contest was close between four participants, but I liked that Todd made the laces hot pink.  Hot pink in the laces will allow me to replace them with black after the wedding.  Rolling to the gym with too much hot pink might look a little funny on me.

While I did get some cool new kicks out of the contest for my wedding, I was interested to see the viral effects of the contest.  Overall, I was very pleased with the results.  The contest ran from March 9th to March 31st.  Here are some stats from the contest:

-Over 1,500 hits to my site
-Almost 1,000 unique visits
-Over 20 user-generated submissions
-Trackbacks to multiple shoe blogs
-Twitter helped push my blog up to readers in Beaverton, OR (Nike HQ)

Todd Skidmore OFFDAMKT

I learned a great deal about how users interact online.  However, there are several things that I would have done differently next time.

1) Make it easier to submit designs.  The process did cause more problems than I expected.  It would’ve been easier to have the users email their designs to me.
2) I wish more public commentary on the design had ensued.  I was disappointed with this aspect of the contest.
3) Get more people that bleed Nike to participate.

Thanks so much to everyone that participated in any form! If you tweeted the post, created an entry or simply left a comment about what you liked, I really appreciate you helping me have fun on my big day!  It’s going to be fun!

The response to my Nike Shox Wedding Contest and your chance to win $50 has been pretty impressive so far.

The Back-story…

About 6 months ago while discussing wedding plans with my fiancée, I tried to convince her that my groomsmen and I should be able to wear customized Nike Shox as our shoes for the wedding.  Somewhat of a debate ensued.

“It will look horrible!” she playfully exclaimed.
“Jerry Seinfeld did it!” I anxiously responded.
“You’re not him!” she responded as if she were my mother.
“I’ll make sure all the Shox match the vests.”
“No, it the worst idea ever!” she exclaimed in her customary, enthusiastic and playful 5-year old like pitch.

At that point, I proceeded to work on her friends, thinking that she might seriously consider it if it had some strong XX chromosome backing.  Outside of one that works for an ad agency, the idea never picked up steam; but I did manage to help the girls burn off lots of calories through laughing.

Fast Forward…

Two weekends ago, my fiancée informed me that she had spent $300 on her wedding shoes.

blue-manolos

And of course, being made up of XX chromosomes, she can’t help but brag about the “deal” she received, especially since the deal is related to shoes.   This price phenomenon is one of those female conversation starters that I’ve never quite figured out, and I consider my female knowledge slightly above average.  Anyway, she saved some $600 on the “Something Blue” Manolo Blahniks that Carrie Bradshaw wears in the Sex and the City Movie.  If I was a girl, I would have jumped up, hugged her, hit her with a pillow, kissed her and then started to…well, you know all that stuff that Cinemax says that women do when men aren’t around.  Unfortunately for both of us, the conversation took more of a logical approach.

“Wait! You get to wear blue shoes with your white (ivory) dress, but I can’t wear my NikeID Shox?” I asked with sarcastic inquiry.
“But, baby,” she said pleadingly.  “They’ll look terrible; and besides, no one will be able to see my shoes,” she said hesitantly as if she knew what my next move was.
“Then, whyyyyyy are we spending $300 on shoes that no one will see?” I responded in typical guy fashion I assume.
I then heard a voice from above whisper to me, “Well played sir.”

I’m not really sure what happened next because I think I mentally blacked out from my strategically placed response; but when I regained consciousness she was telling me about something old, something new, something borrowed, something blue.  The part about blue sounded made-up to me, but I didn’t care because she informed me that if I wanted to wear Nike Shox to the reception only then I could do so.  Victory!!  A series of questions ensued with the only stipulation being that she gets the final say-so.

The Result

After I declared victory, I told her that I would put my social media skills to the test to help choose the colors of my new shoes; thus, we now we have the Nike Shox Wedding Contest.   The goals of the contest are simply to illustrate how the various aspects of social media can be used to create a successful marketing campaign, show how easy it can be to create personal involvement in a brand movement, get people to use their creative talents and for me (and the groomsmen) to be comfortable on my wedding day.

Within 24 hours, I had hits on my site from over 10 countries and a few from Nike’s corporate headquarters.  The contest has a little over 2 weeks to go and there have already been 16 submissions.  So far, I like what I see, but I’d like to see some more questions to make the shoes as personal as possible.   I can’t wait to see what other submissions come forth.

Fine Print: Nike is not officially involved with this contest other than they’ve done their part to keep me as a customer for throughout my entire athletic career.  My fiancee is just simply awesome for letting me do this.

Recent research by In-Stat found the following:

*Almost 20% of game-playing respondents to an In-Stat consumer survey report downloading games from Internet sites other than their mobile carrier’s site.
*Of the 2,000 respondents, 29.5% reported playing games on their mobile handsets.
*In-Stat predicts the global mobile gaming market will top $6.8 billion by 2013.

Source: Cellular News

Stats surrounding mobile advertising are always out of this world because no one really has a clue where it’s going to go.   My curiosity runs high in this market because, like everyone else, I see so much potential.  However, like several other advertising mediums, it lacks a standard structure.

Google’s Android is about to release on the T-Mobile G1 in an attempt to compete with the iPhone.  Right now, a ton of money exists in the application market, but it is subsidized by user-purchases not advertising.  However, only 20% of cell phone users use smart phones (Blackberry, Android, iPhone), so how do companies capitalize on the rest of the market aside from ringtones, SMS and MMS?

What do you see as the next big step in mobile advertising?

Lately, I’ve noticed an abundance of women coming out in advertising commercials; and quite frankly, it’s freaking me out a bit.  I mean that red-headed Wendy is now coming to life in the commercials, and she scares me.  As a kid, I had trouble eating my fries unless I turned the box around.

Most recently, I saw the Sun-Maid Raisin woman come to life.  When I see her picture, I feel as though she will try to force feed me a bushel of green grapes until I can no longer breathe.  It’s 2008.  Are brand managers just now getting comfortable with letting brands run open in the wild?

I think we can all blame Mrs. Buttersworth though for making her presence felt first.  Did anyone else know she was married?  I didn’t.

I can’t figure out why brands are making these characters come to life.  What does that do?  Is Starbucks going to have the Siren come out in their commercials and start attacking latte lovers? In this age of social media, I think they should employ more ideas from their passionate user base such as this viral Wendy’s rap video.

Microsoft’s ego is so large that they fail to acknowledge the principles that have helped make Apple a successful lifestyle products company and are increasingly losing market share in the computer space.  Since Steve Jobs has come on board, he has shown Apple as a simple design company by using young and fresh technology, and their ads have always reflected this.  Microsoft’s new Vista strategy is to do the opposite with a 54-year old comedian.  Really?

I have always loved Seinfeld and Apple.  I don’t hate Microsoft at all, but I feel as though the only reason I keep a copy of their OS (Windows) on my MacBook Pro is because I have to do so, and I rarely use it.  I assume that most Windows users feel the same.  More and more people are asking me if they can buy a Mac and still do “A, B or C” on the Mac like they do Windows.  95% of the time, I answer, “Yes.”

Since Apple switched from Apple Computer, they have run their “Windows versus Mac” ads that use Justin Long to illustrate Leopard’s superiority over Windows.  Apple has always had a high cool factor, but the ads are genius because they bring the idea of switching to consumers in a simple fashion.

Microsoft wants to attract a new generation of users by targeting young people.  According to the Wall Street Journal, Microsoft is about to unveil a “Seinfeld Campus Tour” around the country where Jerry Seinfeld and Bill Gates do a series of commercials.   Seinfeld is one of the most popular celebrities in the world, but his show ended in 1998; and although you can find it on TBS every night, I don’t see him as the cool person to help Microsoft push their latest message.

College is a time when most kids go nuts and discover new things.  Listening to parents is not a commonly practiced pastime of college students and that seems the premise behind the campaign.  I have a feeling the next generation of Apple ads will be about Apple making fun of Microsoft ads being irrelevant.

I went into Starbucks today to nab an Iced Mocha to get my creative juices flowing.  Upon paying, I was granted a receipt that announced my next iced grande beverage would be only $2.  The catch is that it has to be:

•    The same day at the same store
•    It also has to be after 2pm
•    Taxed aren’t included

Starbucks recently announced plans to close approximately 600 stores around the country.  Two of those stores are near me in Atlanta, but I’ve yet to see them shut down.  Starbucks’ new Doubleshot Strategy focuses on their two peak times, which  are in the morning and late in the afternoon when people need that kick.  I assume Starbucks is hoping to create morning and afternoon addicts.

It seems like a good strategy for doubling up business.  However, I think it is only a quick fix like their Pike’s Peak promo fiasco.  I think their idea closing locations to bring the exclusivity back to their brand is what will help drive the Starbucks brand back to investor delight.

$2 Off an Iced Beverage after 2PM

$2 Off an Iced Beverage after 2PM

Recently, I’ve had a few conversations about emerging media and technology with corporate marketing heads. For many companies, they are just now thinking about or starting emerging media departments. One of the common themes that quickly come up is my view on the upcoming generations and the role mobile will play. I’m quick to bring up two points in each conversation.

One, as Cyriac Roeding pointed out earlier this year, the content has got to be redesigned for mobile applications. Companies can’t afford to simply re-purpose online content and then redistribute it amongst cell phones. Too many companies are doing this, and it’s a waste of time. This is discussion for another post though.

The second point I bring up is that companies must start looking past cell phones and iPods. People, especially Gen-Y and early adopters, are about to take their living rooms with them. Recently, I’ve seen Intel ads for a new processor scattered amongst technology sites and LinkedIn. Intel is working on a chip that powers nothing more than a simple computer….no big hard drive, no DVD player, etc. They are designing chips for laptops that won’t be much bigger than a PSP. Need space? Today, you can grab a 250+GB hard drive the size of passport for under $200. My future laptop need be nothing more than a screen, keyboard and USB port. Check out these pictures of the future Lenovo line courtesy of John Bancroft.

Lenovo Mobile Internet Device

Stack of MIDs with Apple iPhone

Here’s an Intel Netbook via Engadget.

My life would be so easy if I could put everything I need in my jacket pocket. The future of music will be streamed not downloaded. I already mentioned my 250GB USB drive. With the power of Google, new frontiers in social media and the upcoming breakout of Web 3.0, I may not even need that large hard drive except for backup purposes. I could be streaming my life to that little device.

Obviously, the emergence of these devices will help define the direction of mobile advertising. But, how fast will companies digest these new processes? They have to think past the mobile phone with SMS. Companies need to start having more conversations with their consumers. This is one area where I see Twitter becoming so powerful. I can’t believe I’m saying this, but GM is already starting to take the lead on Twitter. I’m glad but surprised. They’re having active conversations with their customers. Now, will they truly hear them?

I wish I’d been born in my 8 year-old Godson’s generation (no official title given yet) because by the time he’s college, he may not have to carry anything more than some sort of laptop and Kindle combination.

Aki Spicer, from Fallon, has a wonderful slideshow about the 10 Social Networking Trends. Here are the 10 topics it covers:

1 Social graphs
2 Social shopping
3 Portability
4 Lifestreaming
5 Crowdsourcing
6 Continuous partial attention
7 Privacy protection
8 Open social
9 Virtuality
10 Measurement 2.0

The best part is his insight into the virtual worlds that will be demanded by today’s  youth.  And if you get nothing else from it, his best point was that the good and bad of Social Networking is that no one has figured anything out yet!

I just registered for this Cisco web conference on April 3rd. I’m excited about it. The conference will have some great minds speaking about making your business Web 2.0 (I hate that term) compatible. The conference will demonstrate how these emerging applications can be applied to any type of business. Some of the speakers include: Don Tapscott, Jeremiah Owyang, Robert Scoble and David Knight.

If you’re a small business owner in any industry, work at an ad agency or a newly formed emerging media department, then this will probably be beneficial for you to watch.

Check out the details here. It looks like they’ll have it up for you to view until December 31st, but I think you still need to register.

Declining use of email?

Research suggests that teens rarely use email to communicate. They prefer to send text messages to each other. Considering that they are more likely to be in contact with each other during the day by phone than computer, that makes sense.

But do you think this will continue once they enter the workforce?

In other words, is disinterest in email a factor of their youth, or do you think they will continue to shun email as they get older?

And if so, will business correspondence change as a result?

___________________________________________________________________________________

A business owner on my LinkedIn network posted the question above today. At the time of this writing, I saw many good responses to her question (you can read it here). Some excerpts and common themes were:

“E-mail is the ideal way of sharing documents, files and information in workgroups that are working dispersedly around the globe.”

“Reality is that once you enter the workforce and are no longer able to drop what you are doing to text someone, texting goes away.”

“E-mail will continue to be the medium of choice until a better system comes about. SMS messaging is nice to get something quick out, but you cannot write a business proposal in SMS format, etc.”

I read some good answers, but here are my thoughts. Working in advertising can be an intense daily life…a typical life cycle of an idea is: CMO gets a new idea, passes the responsibility onto his marketing team, they throw it to their agency which in turn has to completely revamp the plan they created yesterday for yesterday’s idea, vendors’ plans get scrapped, which they’ll hear about two weeks later. With all these channels much can get lost along the way just like the telephone game we used to play as children.

Email may decline but it’s still largely useful for storage and lengthy conversations. People used to think phones would die off completely because of email. When I worked in my dad’s company at 12, I remember hearing that phones would be obsolete in ten years. I use one every day. It may not be a land line, since I only use my mobile or Skype; but voice communication is still vital to business. Email is now, and will be more so, used as a filter. It is another ring in the degrees that separate us, and it’s becoming the least credible because anyone has access to it. I used to work for CBS and anyone had access to any employees email in any division of this massive corporation. I doubt seriously Sumner Restone was replying or even reading the emails sent to him unless a screener deemed it necessary. The people he needs to speak with know how to get him. SMS is not the future of Gen Y workers, but mobile is.

I’ll use Mark Cuban as another example, the seemingly rebel owner of the Dallas Mavericks and successful entrepreneur, and dub him the “most tech savvy CEO.” He has a very popular blog which routinely gets at least fifty comments per post. Anyone can email ideas or suggestions to him from the blog. You can find him on Facebook, MySpace and I’m sure countless other social networks. The point is that if you really know him or he wants you to know him, then you will have another way to touch base with him outside of email.

My Blackberry provides you the opportunity to touch base with me via AIM, Yahoo, Google Talk, SMS, MMS or email; and if you have my Blackberry PIN, you can get me on Blackberry Messenger too. And after reading all of those, there are still methods that I’m not using where business is being conducted. I don’t actively use Second Life or WOW, but I know people who would never have otherwise worked together are so now because of their common interest in MMORPGs. All of these niche worlds create new places for people to meet and congregate. Content delivery and quality are being reconstructed to be more efficient and effective in mobile delivery. Intel is about to release a chip that will power a laptop the size of a PSP because some people just need a laptop to run applications not a full blown system. I travel often and don’t need a laptop with huge amounts of storage and/or a DVD player. For around $200, I can buy a 250GB USB hard drive no larger than a Passport and a program that will store and play presentations/movies/games/pictures/etc. I can put the new laptop and hard drive into my jacket pocket…the cell phone into my pants pocket. The point of bringing up the laptop is to illustrate another incentive for content providers to rethink the quality of delivery.

Working in business development, I routinely call media directors, planners and buyers at advertising agencies. Everyone wants a piece of their time. Everyone has something new to show them. The bottom line is that they’re not going to put your idea in front of their client unless it’s A) a better way to do something they already use, B) a game changer that they can’t miss out on or C) they trust you. “C” is the most important because the other two are least likely. They don’t check voicemail at all because they know that, unless they’re waiting to hear back on something specific, it’s probably not anything important. If I want to get in touch with some of the decision makers, I know to try them via SMS, IM or BB Messenger. I even have two senior level ad execs that prefer I get them on Facebook because it doesn’t get flooded with random emails and newsletters…they control their environment. Last week, I had a conversation via SMS with a WPP exec that was attending an AAAA Conference in Orlando. His voicemail, in NYC, said he would be out all week not returning phone calls.

One of the many things my father taught me about running a successful business is that you must change to stay ahead of the curve. In his case, it was all about using new technologies to reinvigorate an old industry…tying things no one else was willing to try.

In recruiting Gen Y and eventually letting them run organizations, people don’t have to become experts on every form of communication or shift entire groups around those methods; but it’s important to be knowledgeable of those forms, and, if needed, hire experts to educate you on them. If you’re older than Gen Y, don’t be scared…reach out and/or listen. If you’re in Gen Y, as I am, be cognoscente of the fact that you will need to grace the presence of the next generation repeating the cycle of older generations today.

I was a huge Michael Jordan fan when I was young. I used to try, notice the italics, to imitate him as a kid. I watched the training videos, read the Bios and scraped together what I could on the young Internet. Jordan and Nike have always put together wonderful commercials. They have been consistent in understanding the amateur athlete and showing that they understand via their various branding initiatives. Phil Knight started making running shoes on the back of a pickup truck, and then he gave universities (see Oregon) free stuff if they used it in public and somehow he managed to maintain that image with the largest sports clothier in the world.

Commercials like this give me chills…because whether you’re playing now, have played or are going to play…we all compete. Chris Paul of the New Orleans Hornets make an appearance. Think the NBA loves this guy? Amazing fundamentally, off-the-radar in a star-studded NBA West, in a Cinderella town…potential to be Legendary. Recognize some of the others…Boise State and Appalachian State playing late.

Earlier this year, Howard Schultz decided to return to his vision at Starbucks (SBUX), and everyone is anxious to see if he can turn around the coffee bean behemoth. Hopefully, he can “pull a Steve Jobs.” About a year ago, I gave my McStarbucks theory about Starbucks starting to serve breakfast. Two months ago they began serving $1 cups of coffee and free refills. This latest strategy is furthering of my McStarbucks theory, and it isn’t what the original vision of Starbucks was intended to be.

I should note that I worked for six months at a Starbucks in New Orleans. I wanted to work there. I had become an evangelist for their brand. It had nothing to do with the coffee. It was the atmosphere and the ambiance associated with it. Based purely on flavor, I could name two places in New Orleans that were better for coffee. New Orleans and Austin, Texas were two markets Starbucks went into carefully because of the loyalists’ attitude each city has for its coffees.

Back to McStarbucks, they are offering $1 cup of coffee and breakfast to compete with McDonald’s. The problem is people don’t go to Starbucks for $1 cups of coffee. They go for the $4 cup of coffee, the atmosphere, the passion of the staff and the free refill you can get if you know the secret way to ask. So, one answer to getting that share price up again has nothing to do with $1 coffee. In fact, I can see it hurting before it helps. They don’t need to ward off their most passionate users. They’ve already started doing it. It just hit me the other day that they’re beginning to push me away. Starbucks is now like an insecure woman, and it’s starting to turn me off. Starbucks can be an insecure man too, but I only date women.

Starbucks has become that needy date. I remember when I was fully single, and I’d be out with friends in one of the same five bars around Atlanta on a Friday night. There was always this one girl who just tried too hard to be available. She was usually cute enough and a great disposition, but she was trying to please everyone. I guess it’s sick or just human nature, but it’s a turn off. For me, I needed the girls I dated to challenge me a bit. By challenge, I don’t mean hostile or playing games. I mean willing to go through the process of getting to know someone…not just being attractive and becoming a ‘yes’ person. It was like everything I talked to her about she seemed to have an answer for or was willing to do. The bottom line is it was too easy, and I had no interest. If I’d wanted to do so, I know what I could’ve done. I don’t know what the female equivalent is, but I’m quite certain there is one.

I’ve often told others that Starbucks creates their most passionate users with the partners they hire. Because even I after I left, I continued to push their products because I’d learned about the culture. I’ve even defended them on occasion. I take pride in knowing about the ideals behind Starbucks. This is starting to leave me. Recently, I moved into a ‘live, work and play’ condo development that has a Starbucks 100 yards from my door. It’s pure evil. The past few trips I’ve made to get coffee have taken me five miles outside of my complex to a Caribou (CBOU) or this great little Atlanta shop called Octane. And along the way, there are 3 other Starbucks before I get to either alternative. I have 4 Starbucks within two square miles of me! It’s too much! Please, stop; leave me alone for a minute. Go talk that other guy’s ear off!! Get the point? I’m not sure she ever did.

I do think Caribou and Octane have better coffee than Starbucks, but I used to bypass them most of the time for the atmosphere. Now, I’m literally driving out of my way to get other coffees. Starbucks has made itself too available to me. Atlanta is about to jump to the number seven market in the country, so it demands many Starbucks, but it’s not NYC or Chicago yet. I don’t need two within 500 feet of each other. Starbucks needs to create that passion, want and mystery again. Whenever I go clubbing in Los Angeles, I always have to wait in a line for at least thirty minutes. When I get inside a place, they are never all that special; but I picked it based on the line. They keep that line outside to capture the bewilderment of the crowds, so everyone is trying to figure out what is the hot place for the night. Starbucks needs to get that back because they’re in danger of becoming just another fast food option.

Make me search for you a bit. I keep thinking that you’ll be at my beckon call when I need you. I’ve begun to take you for granted. Go away for a bit…let me miss you. Eleanor Roosevelt must have been a secure woman as she has famously stated, “Absence makes the heart grow fonder.” FDR was a lucky man!

I found this video via Marketing Headhunter. It’s a look at how Facebook and the CIA are connected trying to mine all of our personal data. Yeah, it’s over the top; but it’s still fun and interesting to see…only about 3 minutes so check it out.

Beta vs. VHS…Laser Disc vs. DVD…HD-DVD vs. Blu-ray…

Winners: Sony, Blu-ray Content Providers, Us (Consumers)

Losers: Toshiba, Apple Microsoft, Anyone Else Trying to Win the Living Room

These are some expensive battles that take place. Sony is always a high stakes player. I keep wondering when they’re going to learn their lesson; but after all their risk taking, it seems like they will finally win a battle. Even when they first introduced the Sony Vaio laptop computer line, they only allowed for Sony memory card to be accepted. They’re always trying to control mediums. It’s a risky game they play because they put all of their resources into the development of a standard, and they will have to endure years of loss because the only people buying Blu-ray anything are early adopters or people that don’t know any better. Combining both is a very small section of the market.

Last week, Netflix and Best Buy said they will go predominantly Blu-ray. Last month, Time Warner said it will make Blu-ray exclusive. Today, Toshiba has said to cede its place in the battle.

My initial thoughts are that Sony will be having a very good Christmas 2008. Sony has not only won a huge format battle, but they have taken a huge step in locking up the War of the Living Room. Apple is one loser in this situation. They have been largely successful with their iPod/iTunes creations, but they aren’t making much headway with Apple TV…for a variety of reasons. Aside from Toshiba, Microsoft is the biggest loser in this war. PS3 has been lagging behind XBOX 360, but sales are expected to either match or surpass those of the XBOX 360 this year. Nintendo Wii has been the most popular and biggest surprise, but the target market is different. The majority of their customers are not the coveted 18-34 year-old male but everyone else. That’s just fine with Nintendo, and they’ve done a fabulous job of targeting “everyone else.” A little unscientific proof…I’m friends with a 22-year old male and about a week before Christmas everyone in his sports club received the highly coveted Nintendo Wii as their prize for a tournament win (around 150 units!). The majority of the men tried to sell/auction them, so they could use the cash to buy an XBOX 360 or Sony PS3.

Before today, the main factor for the projected increase in sales was the price drop on PS3 and that more movie titles have opened up for the PS3. The XBOX 360 has an add-on HD-DVD player, and the PS3 is built with a Blu-ray player. Sony has just taken a huge leap in the War of the Living Room, and this will now be an even larger determining factor in the lead they take over Microsoft. The 18-34 year old market can go out to buy a PS3 for its video game capabilities and Blu-ray technology. This one system can now immediately quench the needs of the typical 18-34 year-old male. It offers a high-end gaming system, Blu-ray player and will finally allow users to buy Blu-ray discs with confidence enabling them to maximize the use of the LCD TVs they invested in last year. Savvy parents will also see the value in the system as well. They can buy a PS3 to meet their child’s video game and Disney Blu-ray needs.

I’m anxious to see Sony’s movement in 2008.